Comparison of Meshless and Finite Element Methods for Elastic–Plastic Assessment of HIPPS Pressure Vessels

Authors

Abstract

This article compares the meshless method and the classical finite element method in the case of elastic-plastic analysis of pressure vessels. The finite element method has proven to be a robust approach over the years and has been continuously developed for both static and dynamic analyses, as well as linear and nonlinear applications. However, the use of the finite element method presents some intrinsic critical issues, such as the generation of the calculation grid or mesh and dependence, leading to the introduction of methods that do not require the explicit generation of a calculation grid, or meshless methods. The purpose of this paper is to review the performance of a meshless resolution compared with the traditional mesh-based approach, in the case of the verification of industrial HIPPS valves, focusing on the precision and quality of the results obtained as well as the operating cost, assessing the method’s operational advantages at an industrial level.

Keywords:

Meshless methods, Pressure Vessels, elastic plastic analysis, HIPPS, ASME BPVC

Author Biography

Giulio Malinverno, FIMAC S.p.A.

Even though I graduated in aerospace engineering, my professional career has been three-quarters in the naval and subsea sector, first with the design of underwater systems for special purposes and then for the verification and validation of subsea actuated valves. This allowed me to refine multiphysics modelling techniques and think systemically, as well as adopt a holistic approach to design, which came in handy when, finally, I found a job in the aerospace field, as a design engineer of environmental control systems for aircraft.

I strongly believe that technology is a living thing in continuous evolution, and, therefore, I always underline the importance of keeping up to date and continuously developing, which, among other things, represents one of my main activities as a member of the Italian groups of IMechE and NAFEMS, organizing webinars and events also open to the general public, to promote scientific activities and re-evaluate the figure of the engineer.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

Malinverno, G. (2026). Comparison of Meshless and Finite Element Methods for Elastic–Plastic Assessment of HIPPS Pressure Vessels. Journal of Next-Generation Research 5.0, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.70792/jngr5.0.v1i6.151

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.